"Hate that I had found it necessary
I confine
communications with
the Merney General to written Documents through the officint
$ far
shannels, – and to avoid as as possible personal intercourse
"public matters.
en
I have to call the attention of the Council to a part of Mr Anstey's evidence .. page 67: It ( correspondence with Mr Amada) states " that the Governor differs from "Mr Anstey in his reading of a
" case which he had cited to m
d proposed . home for the
" support his opinion and "sending
a cale
"Lan Officers of the Crown - This " was done and by return " despatch was received
from
"The Secretary of State for the
€
321
"Celonies which said that the
Law Officers concurred with my
"reading." It is true that such
A
reference
was made as to
the Migation of the Governor Ar attend a Lubpuna of the Impreme Court and all the
correspondence forwarded to
the Secretary of State on
噍
the
8th September 1856, but so for
from
an andwer
being
sent
by return, no answer whatever
the 6th
his
was received, and on October 1857 another Gespatch - was written to the Secretary of State at the instance of the. Chief Justice desiring for quidance that the question
might be decided; and on the 10th March, 1858, Lord Stanley sends the opinion of the Law
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.